As an English instructor, I have spent most of my teaching
career warning students about the use of Wikipedia for their essays. This is
the first time I have really thought about the fact that Wikipedia is “the most
well-known open source wiki on the internet” (Lari, 2011, King and Cox, 2011,
p. 121). The definition of a wiki as stated by Lari (2011) is a “web site that
allows visitors to add, remove, edit and change content” (King and Cox, 2011,
p. 121). So now I am forced to look at wikis in another light and objectively
look at their pros and cons in regards to adult learning.
From a constructivist theorist’s point of view “learning is a social process and learning occurs through interactions” (Lari, 2011, King and Cox, 2011, p. 124). The best feature about wikis is that they are collaborative and can build connections between groups of students. For adult learners, the social aspect of wikis is a place for communities of practice to develop. Communities of practice are “groups of people who share enthusiasm or interest for something they do and learn how to do it better as they interact with each other” (Lari, 2011, King and Cox, 2011, p. 124). The social and collaborative aspects of wikis for adult learners are two pros for incorporating wikis in the classroom as a method for faculty to encourage learners to become more responsible for their own learning.
As for the cons of wikis, there are several. One of the
biggest cons of consulting wikis for information is the fact that anyone can
edit a wiki page. According to West, J. and West, M. (2009) “anyone with
access, permission and a web-browser can contribute to a wiki” (p. 3). That can
be a problem if the person doing the editing is not familiar with the content
he/she is attempting to edit. Another con to wikis is that “a wiki represents
the collective perspective of the group that uses it and therefore it has a
collective bias” (Lari, 2011, King and Cox, 2011, p. 123). An instructor would
then have to add additional content into the classroom discussion about the bias
and possible incorrect information in the wiki that the students would be
creating or consulting. Obviously, there are ways to combat both of these
concerns in a course wiki; however, those would need to be addressed.
Overall, I am not convinced that wikis are something that could add to the learning experience of adult students. As stated in West, J. and West, M. (2009) “adults must see a reason and purpose for their learning in order to fully engage with the instruction” (p. 26).
References
Lari, P. (2011).
The use of wikis for collaboration in higher education. . In K.P. King and T.D.
Cox (Eds.), The Professor’s guide to
taming technology (pp.121-133). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing,
Inc.
West, J. and West, M. (2009). Using wikis for online collaboration. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
It seems we share the same sentiments about Wiki. Although West & West (2009) provide some strong arguments as to why we all should be drinking the Wiki kool-aid I am holding back on doing so. A con you address, one I did not think about is the collective bias perspective. In order for a Wiki project to be effective all members must understand the goal and communication must be consistent. This can be challenging since Wiki allows groups to work from remote locations therefore limiting communication in certain aspects. Wiki projects certainly provide many pro’s as you addressed but I have not seen it in action. In other words I would like to see a wiki page with the additional features used and its potential.
ReplyDeleteI am still having a hard time seeing the value of a wiki in the classroom. I read the article by Hazari, North and Moreland (nd) and while the authors noted the value of students assigning roles and responsibilities and collaboration, they note the need for future research on the features of a wiki that contribute to student learning. That is where I am questioning the value of a wiki.
DeleteI appreciate - and share, to some extent - your questions about the value of the wiki. I had to participate in a wiki for another course, so the wiki we're building for this class is only my second experience with this tool.
ReplyDeleteAs you, I noted that the group bias would influence the value and content in the wiki. Is that bias any different than the bias you or I bring to a paper or other independent project? All of those products bear a bias, but one of an individual author. I think the greater concern would be the group following an erroneous or questionable path in wiki content. As with all learning connections, instructor oversight can be invaluable.
Good question about the bias. I wondered about that notation in West and West (2009). My answer to your question is that yes I would have bias in my paper" however I wouldn't be possibly influencing a group project and possibly persuading others to my thoughts.
ReplyDeleteI would be interested in your feelings about the other wiki you participated in building. It feels to me just like any other group project. Everyone does his/her part and then we put it all together. Doesn't seem to fit what I am reading about what a wiki is supposed to be?